Cases 31 - 40 of 5,080
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 24-6422
Plaintiff:
FRANK REID
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Virginia Department of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Malcolm Thomas
as 24-6297
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MALCOLM ONEIL THOMAS, a/k/a Fresh
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 24-6418
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
CRICKARD, FCI Estill S.C., COMMISSARY STAFF DUERK, FCI Estill S.C., COUNSELOR PLATTS, C-B; FCI Estill S.C. and others
US v. Maurice Geter
as 24-6405
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE DARNELL GETER, a/k/a Rease
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
US v. Reginald Tate
as 24-6220
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REGINALD DAUSHAWN EARL TATE, a/k/a Shawn, a/k/a Booman
AlBritton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Counselor Kayla Mallory, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Barnett, Jr. v. Mr. Mouring
as 24-6395
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR., a/k/a Lady Ja Barnett
Defendant:
MR. MOURING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
