Cases 31 - 40 of 75
VAN DYKE v. PADGET et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
ZACHARY PADGET, SCOTT GOODSON, ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Van Dyke v. Wayne Abernathy
as 14-7842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE ABERNATHY, PATRICK BELL, KENT BROWN and others
Dennis Van Dyke v. United States Probation Office
as 14-7832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Federal Court Sentencing and Crediting Staff
VAN DYKE v. OSTEEN et al
as 1:2014cv01033
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
WILLIAM OSTEEN, KEITH DAMICO and IN CASES #1:14-CV-00712-WO-LPA, # 1:14-CV-759, #1:14-CV-668, #1:14CV578
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Whitney et al
as 1:2014cv00304
Plaintiff:
Dennis Van Dyke
Defendant:
Frank D. Whitney, Louise Flanagan and Julie A. Richards
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Van Dyke v. Louise Flanagan
as 14-7577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, FRANK G. JOHNS, FRANK D. WHITNEY and others
Van Dyke v. U.S. Probation Office et al
as 1:2014cv00277
Plaintiff:
Dennis Van Dyke
Defendant:
U.S. Probation Office and U.S. District Court of North Carolina Western
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DYKE v. WEBSTER et al
as 1:2014cv00790
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
JOE WEBSTER and MAX COGBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dykes et al v. Inmate Services Corporation
as 9:2014cv03609
Plaintiff:
Michael Dykes and Wendy Dykes
Defendant:
Inmate Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. AULD et al
as 1:2014cv00759
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
L. PATRICK AULD, RANA M. BADWAN and DAILY COUIER NEWS PAPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
