Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,832
Mitchell v. Riddick et al
as 5:2024ct03182
Defendant: Officer Lewis, Officer Riddick, Officer Poole and others
Plaintiff: David Akeem Benjamen Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latimore v. Detective R.W. VanPelt et al
as 6:2024cv04197
Plaintiff: John D Latimore, Jr. and John David Latimore, Jr
Defendant: Ofc. Smith, Sgt. Sellers, Ofc. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Suire v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv02200
Defendant: Bailey
Plaintiff: David Myron Suire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Leu
as 2:2024cv00457
Defendant: David Leu
Petitioner: Kali Eus Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clardy v. Banks et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant: Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Juanece Banks, Frederick Russell and others
Plaintiff: MarQui Clardy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deans v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00480
Defendant: Lois Fegan, J. Hampton, Blevins and others
Plaintiff: Donshea O. Deans, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. USA
as 3:2024cv00675
Petitioner: David Perez Garcia
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Noble Stockett v. Rounds
as 1:2024cv02137
Plaintiff: Adrian Noble Stockett
Defendant: Officer David Rounds, Jr.
Interested Party: Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mulder v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02135
Petitioner: William Brian Mulder
Respondent: David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. United States et al
as 6:2024cv04060
Defendant: United States, Greenville County and Jackson County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff: Garrin David Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?