Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Hanks v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2011cv00211
Plaintiff:
Isha Denise Hanks
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Norfolk City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail
as 1:2011cv00212
Plaintiff:
Isha Denise Hanks
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeBrew v. Brooks et al
as 5:2010ct03198
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. DeBrew
Defendant:
Brandon Brooks, P. Collins, Lt. Dodson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv00477
Petitioner:
Hank Aaron Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2009cv00404
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Hank Aaron Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bradford Tilghman v. William Caton
as 09-7557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADFORD L. TILGHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM CATON, Counselor, MIKE MUIR, Counselor's Supervisor and ROBERT HANKE, F.A.
Party-in-Interest - None:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Daniel Staley v. Judge Russo
as 09-6926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL LEVERN STALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE RUSSO, ED CLEMENS, Solicitor, TIMOTHY H. POGUE, Judge and others
Sheril Carr v. Hank Hazelwood
as 09-6016
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHERIL A. CARR
Defendant - Appellant:
HANK HAZELWOOD
Defendant - None:
PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT JAIL, COUNTY OF PITTSYLVANIA, STATE OF VIRGINIA and others
Movant - None:
MICHAEL W. TAYLOR, Sheriff
Jonathan Riches v. Urban Outfitters Incorporated
as 08-7981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
URBAN OUTFITTERS INCORPORATED, THE WARNACO GROUP INCORPORATED, FCI WILLIAMSBURG and others
Tilghman v. Caton et al
as 8:2008cv02269
Plaintiff:
Bradford L. Tilghman
Defendant:
William Caton, Mike Muir and Robert Hanke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
