Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Goodman v. Searls We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00122
Petitioner: Kevin Goodman, Jr.
Respondent: Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montgomery v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00054
Plaintiff: Jasman Raheem Montgomery
Defendant: Gregory Jones, Shelby Searls and Investigators
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elan Bell-Veney v. Shelby Searls
as 22-7423
Petitioner / Appellant: ELAN BELL-VENEY
Respondent / Appellee: SHELBY SEARLS, Superintendent, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Lentz v. Harris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00150
Plaintiff: Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant: Brandeshawn Harris, Betty Brown, Kimberly Grande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Coontz v. Shelby Searls
as 22-7182
Petitioner / Appellant: WILLIAM ERIC COONTZ
Respondent / Appellee: SHELBY SEARLS
Bell-Veney v. Searls
as 5:2022cv00232
Petitioner: Elan Bell-Veney
Respondent: Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coontz v. Searls We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00212
Petitioner: William Eric Coontz
Respondent: Shelby O. Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antonio Collins v. Shelby Searls
as 22-6900
Petitioner / Appellant: ANTONIO COLLINS
Respondent / Appellee: SHELBY SEARLS, Superintendent, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Jeffrey Hazlett v. Shelby Searls
as 22-6872
Petitioner / Appellant: JEFFREY A. HAZLETT
Respondent / Appellee: SHELBY SEARLS, Superintendent
Lentz v. Honeycutt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff: Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant: FNU Honeycutt, FNU Dye and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?