Cases 41 - 50 of 185
Montgomery v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00632
Plaintiff:
Chancellor Deshawn Montgomery
Defendant:
Sam Ray, C/O Jackson, Kenneth Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00636
Defendant:
Cynthia Petty, Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. SCDC et al
as 9:2021cv00650
Defendant:
SCDC, Brian P Stirling, Frank Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Sterling L. Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
German v. Stirling et al
as 9:2021cv00634
Defendant:
William Burley III, Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
JaKobe German
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00407
Defendant:
Cynthia Petty, Annie McCullough, Jamal R. Clavon and others
Plaintiff:
Justin M. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00199
Defendant:
Arenda Thomas, Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Javon Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thiam v. Joyner et al
as 8:2020cv03236
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Emily Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Thiam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Stirling et al
as 2:2020cv03191
Plaintiff:
Shawn Davis
Defendant:
Aaron Joyner, Byron Stirling, Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Legette v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv02092
Defendant:
Associate Warden Rudy Tisdale, Associate Warden Sharpe, South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Legette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, The et al
as 1:2020cv02094
Defendant:
Uniqueqa Akeema James, South Carolina Department of Corrections, The and Warden Aaron Joyner
Plaintiff:
Gartharee Hinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
