Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Taylor v. Bradshaw
as 1:2013cv00729
Plaintiff:
Nathan Taylor
Defendant:
Chris Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. McCall
as 0:2012cv03624
Petitioner:
Terrence Lyndon Jermaine Bradshaw
Respondent:
Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lott v. Bradshaw et al
as 2:2012cv01190
Plaintiff:
Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant:
Linda Bradshaw, Kenneth Sharp and Kevin Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Helems
as 5:2012cv01078
Plaintiff:
Hampton P Bradshaw
Defendant:
James Helems, Arlette Jones, B Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Kershaw County et al
as 1:2011cv02419
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Kershaw County , Southeastern Service Group Inc, Susan Mears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Kershaw County et al
as 5:2011cv02419
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Kershaw County , Hudson Murray , Ada Blackmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Meggs, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 11-7016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY D. MEGGS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CECILIA R. REYNOLDS, Warden of Kershaw County Correctional Institution and LINDA BRADSHAW, A W of Turbeville C I
Bradshaw v. New River Regional Jail et al
as 7:2011cv00240
Plaintiff:
Bobby D. Bradshaw, Jr.
Defendant:
New River Regional Jail and Virginia Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Ozmint et al
as 3:2011cv01035
Plaintiff:
Quantrell Wilson
Defendant:
Ozmint, Kenneth Sharpe, George P Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meggs v. State of South Carolina et al
as 8:2011cv00949
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Donald Meggs, Jr
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Cecilia Reynolds and Linda Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
