Cases 41 - 50 of 343
Floyd v. USA
as 1:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Hasson Lewis Floyd
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Floyd v. Nines et al
as 1:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Jeffery Nines, Ronald Stotler and Ms. Sharon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. MRDCC Medical Department et al
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
MRDCC Medical Department, RN Prince Talo and Dr Mulugeta B. Akal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd Hunt, Jr. v. Rick White
as 22-7342
Petitioner / Appellant:
FLOYD O. HUNT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK WHITE
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Warden Cleveland Friday
as 22-7322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN CLEVELAND FRIDAY, WARDEN NURUDEEN MATTI, CHIEF OF SECURITY MS. MANN and others
v. Floyd et al
as 2:2022cv03294
Plaintiff:
Erica N. Floyd
Defendant:
Barnwell County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cureton v. Gray et al
as 5:2022ct03329
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton, Jr.
Defendant:
John R. Gray, Mark Flemmings, Monica Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Weber et al
as 1:2022cv02172
Plaintiff:
Floyd Glenn Williams
Defendant:
Warden R. S. Weber, Dr. Matthew Alaway, Dr. Jason Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. NBCI Account Finance Manager et al
as 1:2022cv02090
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
NBCI Account Finance Manager, M. Sharon, Warden Jeffery Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Mudimba
as 1:2022cv02055
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
Corporal J. Mudimba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
