Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Roger Persinger, Jr. v. Northern Regional Jail
as 15-7284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER DALE PERSINGER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHERN REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DALE GRIFFITH, Unit Manager (NCF), sued in individual capacity, JAMES RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner Division of Corrections, sued in individual capacity and others
Roger Persinger, Jr. v. Northern Regional Jail
as 15-7284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER DALE PERSINGER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DALE GRIFFITH, Unit Manager (NCF), sued in individual capacity, JAMES RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner Division of Corrections, sued in individual capacity and others
Joseph Griffith v. US
as 15-7139
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH GRIFFITH
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Antonio DeShawn Robinson v. Charles D. Griffith, Jr.
as 15-6953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO DESHAWN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES D. GRIFFITH, JR.
Palmer v. Griffith et al
as 1:2015cv01586
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daniel Palmer
Defendant:
Robert Griffith and Andrew Seckenf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Griffith
as 2:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
Antonio DeShawn Robinson
Defendant:
Charles D. Griffith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogel v. Harrison et al
as 5:2015ct03084
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Fogel
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison , Michael Ramirez , Joshua Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Saunders
as 5:2015hc02028
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Griffith
Respondent:
Sorrell Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. James et al
as 3:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Hall, Sr.
Defendant:
Co. Justin James, Brandy Miller, Karen Pszczolkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Griffith et al
as 2:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Hall, Sr.
Defendant:
Dale Griffith, Ryan Addams, Jim Rubenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
