Cases 41 - 50 of 70
James Johnson v. US
as 15-6887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BOWERS JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
James Johnson v. US
as 15-6886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BOWERS JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Jones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2014cv00225
Plaintiff:
Ryan Randall Ramey
Defendant:
Commissioner Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ryan Randall Ramey
Defendant:
Commissioner Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01635
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome Brown v. IRS
as 13-7225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, United States Department of the Treasury
Bussie v. Andrews et al
as 5:2013cv00322
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
Robert E. Andrews and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2013cv00031
Petitioner:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
