Cases 41 - 50 of 7,565
Young v. Wright et al.
as 9:2024cv03114
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Honorable Alan Wilson, Donald J Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deramus v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03127
Plaintiff:
Willie Darnell Deramus
Defendant:
J. Nuna Lee, Sgt. B. Overton, Lt. Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akeem Mason v. J. Booth
as 24-6460
Plaintiff:
AKEEM C. MASON
Defendant:
J. BOOTH, Captain - GTL site supervisor, DEBORAH ALDERSON, CEO, Chairman of GTL and GLOBAL TEL LINK, inmate calling service
Lynch v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv03010
Plaintiff:
James Lynch, III and Ras J. Ammi Tafari
Defendant:
Stacy Smith, Bonnie Degraffenried and Karen Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hurt v. J. Monts et al
as 8:2024cv02975
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mason Hurt
Defendant:
J. Monts and Detective Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wolff v. Rose
as 5:2024ct03108
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Wolff
Defendant:
Dallas Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03111
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Fleming
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Anthony J. Mincey, Lt. Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locklear v. J. Reuben Long Detention Center
as 6:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
Justin Locklear
Defendant:
J. Reuben Long Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Fleming v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Fleming
Defendant:
Talena Lee, Anthony J. Mincey, FNU Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schneider v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Elliott R. Schneider
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, J. Phillip Morgan, William Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
