Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Rochester v. Page et al
as 6:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
James Page, Stoney Drake, R B Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lay v. Bennett
as 1:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
John Robert Lay
Defendant:
Richard D. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv03467
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Minton v. Aron et al
as 3:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
John Robert Minton
Defendant:
FNU Aron, Sally Triplett and David Davis
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos v. Eric Holder
as 13-6516
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Hinton v. Obama et al
as 5:2013ct03022
Plaintiff:
Henderson Lewis Hinton
Defendant:
Barak H. Obama, John Roberts, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Demos v. US Secretary of State et al
as 3:2013cv00032
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
US Secretary of State, US Attorney General and US Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Demos et al v. U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 2:2013cv00001
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
U.S. Secretary of Defense, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03715
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
