Cases 41 - 50 of 209
Sandlain v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Blake Sandlain
Defendant:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sandlain v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00304
Petitioner:
Blake Sandlain
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sandlain v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00276
Petitioner:
Blake Sandlain
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sandlain v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00222
Petitioner:
Blake Sandlain
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden Rokosky and Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hill v. FCI McDowell Warden
as 1:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
John Farelin Hill
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hill v. FCI McDowell Warden
as 1:2022cv00176
Petitioner:
John Farelin Hill
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Collins v. The McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
John Mark Collins, II and Mattie Collins McGuire
Defendant:
The McDowell County Commission, Tina Blackburn, Barbara Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake Sandlain v. C. Maruka
as 22-6226
Petitioner / Appellant:
BLAKE SANDLAIN
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN C. MARUKA, FCI McDowell
Sutton v. Director Gail Watts et al
as 1:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Douglas McArthur Sutton, III
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Sgt. Salisbury, Sgt. Carter, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Stevens Correctional Center et al
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Matthew Allen Taylor
Defendant:
Stevens Correctional Center, McDowell County Correctional Center, McDowell County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
