Cases 41 - 50 of 936
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02195
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02115
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Littlejohn v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03224
Plaintiff:
Allen Littlejohn and Allen Littlejohn, III
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Raymond Bailey, Rosemary Biancardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Younkin et al
as 7:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Glen Younkin, John S. Edwards, R. Creigh Deeds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drumgoole v. USA-2255
as 1:2023cv01923
Petitioner:
Raymond Drumgoole
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Drumgoole v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01897
Plaintiff:
Raymond Drumgoole
Defendant:
Warden, Disctrict Attorney on this case, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Raymond Aigbekaen
as 23-6672
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN
Bey v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02137
Petitioner:
Raymond A. Bey and Raymond Anthony Bey
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Powell v. Prima Care Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01671
Plaintiff:
Raymond Powell
Defendant:
Prima Care Medical Inc., Yolanda Rawlerson, Zowie Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
