Cases 41 - 50 of 321
US v. Jusamuel McCreary
as 22-7168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSAMUEL RODRIGUEZ MCCREARY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ramirez-Rodriguez v. Wolfe
as 3:2022cv00146
Petitioner:
Jose M. Ramirez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
R. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez-Porras v. Fleming et al
as 5:2022ct03328
Plaintiff:
Jeovanny D. Rodriguez-Porras
Defendant:
Mark Fleming, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
RODRIGUEZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00661
Petitioner:
LUIS A. PEREZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RODRIGUEZ PEREZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00430
Petitioner:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ and LUIS A. PEREZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
USA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Elias Rodriguez v. David Leu
as 22-6682
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELIAS JUNIOR RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID LEU
Jeovanny Rodriguez-Porras v. Demetrius Clark
as 22-6496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEOVANNY D. RODRIGUEZ-PORRAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMETRIUS A. CLARK, MS. WHITE, NURSE PIEARE and others
Defendant:
BERTIE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
