Cases 41 - 50 of 2,432
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6499
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, Laurens County Jail, KIM LITTLE, Mental Health Laurens County Jail and others
Pacheco v. Love et al
as 5:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Skyler Love, FNU Greene, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitzgerald v. Jane Doe et al
as 5:2024ct03130
Plaintiff:
Shawreed Jawon Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and John Doe Deputy Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarun Vyas v. Jason Miyares
as 24-6291
Petitioner:
TARUN KUMAR VYAS
Respondent:
JASON S. MIYARES and SHERIFF BRYAN HUTCHESON
Morgan v. Charles County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Kevin Morgan
Defendant:
Charles County Sheriff's Office, Charles County Detention Center, C/O Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Newberry v. Cofty et al
as 1:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Newberry and Flip
Defendant:
Patricia M. Cofty, Michael J. Prodan, Steve E. Sizemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Kevin Linder v. Donald Brown
as 24-6366
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MAURICE LINDER
Defendant:
DONALD G. BROWN, Sheriff of Catawba County, DEPUTY LUNA, DEPUTY COOK and others
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Putney v. Harford County Government et al
as 1:2024cv01459
Plaintiff:
Kory Putney
Defendant:
Harford County Government, Sheriff Jeffrey R. Gahler and Warden Daniel Galbraith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Franklin et al
as 5:2024ct03128
Plaintiff:
David Henderson
Defendant:
Allison Franklin, Bryan Nelson, N. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
