Cases 51 - 60 of 520
Gaines v. State of South Carolina et al
as 8:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Damorius D. Gaines, Damorius Dontavis Gaines and Damorius Dontavious Gaines
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Anderson County Incorporated, Geoffrey Benedict Eaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kidwell v. USA
as 5:2022cv81491
Petitioner:
Craig Allen Kidwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SEAGRAVES v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SEAGRAVES
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and CAPTAIN WILLIAM FLINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Mann et al
as 7:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eubert Cain
Defendant:
Rajvinder Mann, Craig Reigel, Gregory Domson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Anderson County et al
as 8:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Grayson Mathis, Sr
Defendant:
Anderson County, Anderson County Sheriffs Office, Anderson, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Gaines v. Eaton et al
as 8:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Damorius D. Gaines, Damorius Dontavis Gaines and Damorius Dontavious Gaines
Defendant:
Geoffrey Benedict Eaton, Creig A. Gardner, Catherine T. Huey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Viney v. Roberson
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Wesley Daniel Viney
Defendant:
Craig Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Viney v. Roberson
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wesley Daniel Viney
Defendant:
Craig Roberson and Cpt. Lasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03278
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03130
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
