Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Michael A. Dilworth v. Ed McMahon
as 13-7986
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY DILWORTH
Respondent - Appellee:
ED MCMAHON
Dilworth v. McMahon et al
as 5:2013ct03291
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dilworth
Defendant:
Ed McMahon, Captain Adams, A.R. Fales, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dilworth v. McMahon
as 5:2013hc02211
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Dilworth
Respondent:
Ed McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wirtz v. Oconee County Sheriffs Department, The et al
as 8:2013cv01041
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Wirtz
Defendant:
Oconee County Sheriffs Department, The and David McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Timothy Hines v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC
as 13-6527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, BRANDI BURNETTE and JAMES PENCE
Defendant:
EDWARD J. MCMAHON, individually and in his official capacity as sheriff of New Hanover County, North Carolina, CAPTAIN MARTY ADAMS, individually and in his official capacity as Captain and Detention Division Commander, New Hanover County Sheriff's Department, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Lloyd v. McMahon et al
as 5:2012ct03163
Plaintiff:
Annis Recardo Lloyd
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon, Captain McNeish, Captain Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. McMahon
as 5:2011ct03086
Plaintiff:
Shelly Washington
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 7:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hines
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC , Brandi Burnette , James Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ash, Jr. v. McMahon et al
as 1:2009cv03327
Plaintiff:
Edward L Ash, Jr.
Defendant:
Sandy McMahon, David Mathis and Kathleen Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
