Cases 61 - 70 of 1,254
Randolph v. USA
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rakibu v. U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement
as 3:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Adam Rakibu
Respondent:
U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER EL v. WADDEL et al
as 1:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDEL, JASON ADAMS, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Yawn et al
as 5:2023ct03348
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Colleen Yawn, Tana Dillard-Hill, William M. Mouring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Truner et al
as 5:2023ct03338
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
Sgt. Truner and DAC of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Syme
as 7:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Mark Adam Syme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections
as 8:2023cv06143
Petitioner:
Brandon Adams
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03322
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Governor Roy Cooper, Todd E. Ishee, Stephen Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
