Cases 61 - 70 of 611
Floyd et al v. North Carolina State et al
as 5:2022ct03203
Plaintiff:
Tanis Floyd and Robert H. Wolfe
Defendant:
North Carolina State and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. North Carolina State et al
as 5:2022ct03199
Plaintiff:
Howard H. Wolfe
Defendant:
North Carolina State and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnnie Wills v. Karen Pszczolkowski
as 22-6704
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNNIE FRANKLIN WILLS
Respondent / Appellee:
KAREN PSZCZOLKOWSKI, Superintendent, Northern Correctional Facility
HOSKINS v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS et al
as 1:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. HOSKINS
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, ROY COOPER, Patricia Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farmer v. Graham
as 5:2022ct03164
Plaintiff:
Barwon Farmer
Defendant:
Franklin Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Naph Care Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lamont Franklin
Defendant:
Naph Care Inc., Roanoke City Jail, S. Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Burke et al
as 7:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lamont Franklin
Defendant:
Deputy Burke, Roanoke City Jail and Roanoke Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Naph Care Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lamont Franklin
Defendant:
Naph Care Inc., S. Walsh and Roanoke City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin Smith v. Cpl. D. Beavers
as 22-6518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CPL D. N. BEAVERS, Corporal, CPL. UZZLE, Corporal/Intel, D. A. TAYLOR, Deputy/Intel and others
Agee v. Church et al
as 1:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Ted Agee
Defendant:
FNU Church, FNU Shields, FNU Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
