Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Carter v. McCoy et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, C. J. Smith, C. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronnie Whitener v. John Patterson
as 24-6049
Plaintiff:
RONNIE DALE WHITENER
Defendant:
JOHN PATTERSON, RCDC Sergeant, in his individual and official capacity, JOHN COOLEY, RCDC Officer, in his individual and official capacity, JOSHUA GOODWIN, RCDC Officer, in his individual and official capacity and others
Cooley v. Nunley et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Walter Andrew Cooley
Respondent:
William Nunley and Harvey Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Levi Springer v. Warden David E. Anderson
as 22-7473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID ANDERSON, ASSISTANT WARDEN JOSEPH D. BATEMAN, CHIEF OF SECURITY HOWARD SHARPE and others
Springer v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Assistant Warden Joseph D. Bateman, Chief of Security Howard Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmy-Joe Cooley v. Gary Martin, Jr.
as 22-1670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY-JOE COOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY L. MARTIN, JR.
Campbell v. Cooley
as 7:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Bernard B. Campbell, Jr.
Defendant:
William Edward Cooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Martin Jr
as 3:2021cv02739
Plaintiff:
Jimmy-Joe Cooley and Jimmy-Joe: Cooley
Defendant:
Gary L. Martin Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matherly v. Clark et al
as 3:2020cv00935
Defendant:
Officer Renada Tillery, Nurse Wytasha Howell, Officer Chicarla Sykes and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator Daniel Thomas Matherly and Daniel Thomas Matherly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. South Carolina, State of
as 3:2019cv03424
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Joe Cooley
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
