Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Vega v. Cramer
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Saul Vega
Defendant:
Jeffrey D. Cramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Summerville Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv00782
Plaintiff:
Christopher Todd Perry
Defendant:
Summerville Police Department , Summerville, Town of , Jon Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cramer v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00127
Petitioner:
Paul Joe Cramer
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Legg v. South Central Regional Jail et al
as 2:2016cv10546
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Legg, Jr., Ian Michael Cramer and Shane Stephen Holbrook
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail, Jerod Terry, Ryan Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemphill v. Cramer et al
as 5:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Hemphill
Defendant:
Officer Cramer, Officer Lewis, Officer Brevard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Jackson v. County of Greenville S.C.
as 15-6104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT M. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF GREENVILLE SOUTH CAROLINA, SCOTTY BODIFORD, C/O Jail Administrator, J. QUINN, Officer and others
Jackson v. County of Greenville South Carolina et al
as 6:2014cv03826
Plaintiff:
Robert M Jackson
Defendant:
County of Greenville South Carolina, Scotty R Bodiford, J Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Cramer v. Warden, Broad River Correction
as 09-6795
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA K. CRAMER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cramer v. Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
as 9:2008cv01589
Petitioner:
Joshua K Cramer
Respondent:
Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cramer v. Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
as 0:2008cv01589
Petitioner:
Joshua K Cramer
Respondent:
Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
