Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jeremy Defour v. G. Walker
as 22-7448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY PAUL DEFOUR
Defendant / Appellee:
G. WALKER, Chief of Housing for Buckingham, BUCKINGHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER WARDEN, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director and others
DeFour v. Walker et al
as 7:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
G. Walker, Buckingham Correctional Center Warden, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aikens v. Walker et al
as 3:2019cv00284
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Aikens
Defendant:
John G. Walker and Dametra Monique Ogletree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Vann et al
as 1:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roberts
Defendant:
M. C. Vann and K. G. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruff v. Walker et al
as 1:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamont Ruff
Defendant:
Thomas G. Walker, Shelby Police Department and David A. Wacaster
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Bartko v. Clay Wheeler
as 14-7184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY BARTKO
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAY CAMPBELL WHEELER, SCOTT B. HOLLENBECK, GEORGE E. B. HOLDING, Individually and as United States Attorney, for the Eastern District of North Carolina and others
Bartko v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2014ct03043
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bartko
Defendant:
Clay Campbell Wheeler, Scott B. Hollenbeck, George E.B. Holding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTKO v. WHEELER et al
as 1:2013cv01006
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BARTKO
Defendant:
CLAY CAMPBELL WHEELER, SCOTT B. HOLLENBECK, GEORGE E.B. HOLDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Deena Kaye Myers
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Clyde Alderman, Jerry Streat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYCE v. RANDOLPH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2008cv00144
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
RANDOLPH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, VANCE BRADFORD LONG, LACY H. THORNBURG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
