Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 331
Green v. USA
as 5:2024cv00102
Petitioner: Leneil Randolph Green
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Randolph Johnson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6280
Petitioner: RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE
LAMBERT v. RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner: BRANSON LAMBERT
Respondent: RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Randolph v. USA
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner: Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harris v. Janson et al
as 2:2023cv06916
Plaintiff: Patrick O'neal Harris
Defendant: Warden S. Janson, Officer P. Davis, R&D Officer Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02275
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Randolph v. The State et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv05952
Plaintiff: Joseph Thomas Randolph
Defendant: The State and SC DPPPS Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Joseph Mays v. Jennifer Saad
as 23-7127
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee: JENNIFER SAAD, RICHARD HUDGINS, MS. R. THOMPSON and others
David Meyers v. Postmaster General
as 23-7118
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee: THE POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, CHIEF OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION UNIT, KRUSE and others
Jeremy Defour v. Lieutenant Webber
as 23-7010
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEREMY PAUL DEFOUR
Defendant / Appellee: LIEUTENANT WEBBER, OFFICER BEATY, a/k/a Officer Bates, INTELLIGENCE OFFICER ROSSON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?