Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Thomas v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00716
Defendant:
Falie Louis, RN, Roshaunda Friday, RN, Janika Campbell, CNA and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas, Lessie, Power of Attorney for Jamil Stafford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carter v. Irving, et al.
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
T'von Maurice Carter
Defendant:
Sheriff Antoinette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becton v. USA
as 4:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Antoinette Charmane Becton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Young v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Antoinette Young
Respondent:
Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thomas v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00144
Petitioner:
Antoinette Thomas
Respondent:
Warden G. Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Holman v. Irving
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Rashid Holman
Defendant:
Antoinette V. Irving and Antionette V. Irving
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Irving et al
as 1:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
Marvin Moore
Defendant:
Antoinette V. Irving, Captain Lawson and Captain Feltahway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Vaught v. Irving et al
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Deandre Vaught
Defendant:
Antoinette Irving, C. Harris and Deca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Robert Green et al
as 1:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Sebastian A. Campbell
Defendant:
Robert Green, Allen Gang, Antoinette Washington and others
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General of Maryland and Division of Correction State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gail v. Irving
as 3:2021cv00815
Petitioner:
Devrick Raquan Gail
Defendant:
Major Antoinette Irving
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
