Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dean et al v. Barrow et al
as 8:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Dean and Diamond Morris-Lee
Defendant:
Cory Barrow, Unknown Members of the City of Anderson Police Department, Anderson Police Department, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kazimierczak v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2022cv03579
Plaintiff:
Cameron Kazimierczak
Defendant:
Marcus Rhodes, Phillip Thompson, J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Byrd v. J Reuben Long Detention Center et al
as 5:2022cv03284
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Byrd
Defendant:
J Reuben Long Detention Center, Officer Barrow and Officer Isom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Mediko Inc et al
as 5:2022cv02387
Plaintiff:
Antonio L Jones
Defendant:
Mediko Inc, Phillip Thompson, Marcus Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWERY v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00888
Defendant:
SAUNDERS, J. JESSUP, D. BARROW and others
Plaintiff:
KENYANA LOWERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Barrow et al
as 2:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Officer Barrow, Dickerson and Herrell
Plaintiff:
Lavor Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Andrews
as 5:2018hc02264
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Petitioner:
Donnell Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sirleaf v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00539
Plaintiff:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Hannah M. Lauck, Roderick C. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe v. Barrow et al
as 5:2015ct03016
Plaintiff:
Kelcey Roswell Thorpe
Defendant:
Marcus Barrow, Sergeant Gwynn, D.A. Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
