Cases 1 - 10 of 24
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
Director Michael Carvajal, Doe 1, K. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shade v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
John William Shade, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, Jason Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Hudgins et al
as 5:2022cv00203
Petitioner:
Saundra L. White
Respondent:
Warden Hudgins, SFF Warden P. Adams, SFF K-Unit Manager Lori Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed, Corp Sole v. Whitmer et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed, Corp Sole doing business as Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
Chris Whitmer, Erick Helenihi, April Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Carvajal et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Michael D. Carvajal, J. C. Petrucc, John or Jane Doe and others
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maldonado v. Carvajal et al
as 5:2021cv00514
Plaintiff:
Garcia Feliz Maldonado
Defendant:
Michael D. Carvajal, J. C. Petrucc, D. L. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belcher v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00529
Plaintiff:
Rhonda S. Belcher
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00530
Plaintiff:
Megan Moore
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Syslo v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
Taylor Syslo
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
