Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Keith v. Federal Prisons Director of B.O.P. et al
as 5:2023ct03325
Plaintiff:
Anin M. Keith and Anin Michael Keith
Defendant:
Federal Prisons Director of B.O.P., Collette Peters, Warden Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gash v. Thomas et al
as 9:2023cv04168
Plaintiff:
Kentrell Lamar Gash
Defendant:
Ass. Warden Thomas, Cpt. Gregg, Cpt. McPhaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. Lee Correctional Institution
as 4:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Damorius D. Gaines, Damorius Dontavis Gaines and Damorius Dontavious Gaines
Defendant:
Lee Correctional Institution, Warden Jackson, Warden Tisdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Morley v. Edmonds et al
as 2:2021cv00359
Defendant:
LT. Conyers, Ofc. Turner, Ms. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Eliott Morley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coward v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00702
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Donnell Coward and Kelvin D. Coward
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, D. Dameron, S. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conyers v. Jackson et al
as 2:2019cv03315
Defendant:
Clarendon County Sheriff's Office, The, Clarendon County and William J Jackson
Plaintiff:
Lucretia Conyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conyers v. Warden, FCC Petersburg
as 2:2019cv00244
Petitioner:
James Junior Conyers
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Petersburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Michael Ferola v. Officer Fulton
as 16-7212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. FEROLA
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER FULTON
Defendant:
WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., GREGORY KNOWLIN, KENNETH SHARP and others
Conyers v. USA
as 7:2016cv00313
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Junior Conyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
