Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Davis v. Smith and Robinson Law Firm et al
as 0:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
LaQuinces D. Davis
Defendant:
Smith and Robinson Law Firm, South Carolina Insurance Reserve Fund and S.C. Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dalton v. Sapp et al
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
David Dalton
Defendant:
Lt. B.R. Sapp, L. Witcher and Clint D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Palmer et al
as 2:2023cv05273
Plaintiff:
Robbie Collins
Defendant:
John Palmer, Major, Hefner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forster v. Krasnoff et al
as 1:2023cv01361
Plaintiff:
Tommie Forster and Tommie Matthias El
Defendant:
Alan P. Krasnoff, Clint D. Davis, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
James Brown v. D. Leu
as 23-6120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES W. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. LEU, Warden, D. SMITH, Captain, R. CARMONA, Unit Manager and others
Colton Rickels v. D. Leu
as 22-7134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLTON RICKELS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN D. LEU, T. KILPATRICK, D. DAVIS and others
Lightfoot v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Rodney William Lightfoot
Defendant:
Clent D. Davis, M. Maurice and M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shouse v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Jacob Allan Shouse
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Denise Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Leu et al
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
James W Brown, Matthew J Collins, Michael Vasquez and others
Defendant:
D. Leu, D. Smith, R. Carmona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contee v. Foust et al
as 1:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Robert Contee
Defendant:
Sgt. Wright, CO II Blain, CO II Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
