Cases 1 - 10 of 3,349
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Director Department Corrections
as 1:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Director Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryan Turner v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6323
Petitioner:
RYAN MARTEZ TURNER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6529
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, SHERIFF REYNOLDS, Laurens County and others
David Little, Jr. v. John Palmer
as 24-6516
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN PALMER, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, T. ROBERTSON, Assistant Warden and others
Day v. Rich et al
as 5:2024ct03135
Plaintiff:
Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rich, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Matthew Budney v. Ronnie Huneycutt
as 24-6326
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY, f/k/a Matthew R. Budney
Defendant:
RONNIE LANE HUNEYCUTT, Superintendent Warden at Avery Mitchell Correctional, BRIAN WATSON, Special Affairs Captain at Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution, RANDY S. MULL, Disciplinary Hearing Officer for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
