Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Martin v. Baltimore County Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Randall Martin
Defendant:
Baltimore County Police Department, Thomas Thayer, H. Elbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Elbert Smith v. Michael Pauley
as 23-6199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELBERT SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT MICHAEL PAULEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER S. SMITH, Property Officer, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CUYKINDALL, Property Officer and others
Elbert Smith v. Sergeant Michael Pauley
as 22-6657
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELBERT SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT MICHAEL PAULEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER S. SMITH, Property Officer, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CUYKINDALL, Property Officer and others
McNeill v. USA
as 5:2022cv00066
Petitioner:
Elbert Tojuan McNeill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Pauley et al
as 7:2021cv00457
Plaintiff:
Elbert Smith
Defendant:
Sergeant Michael Pauley, Correctional Officer S. Smith, Correctional Officer Cuykindall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Jackie Bird, et al
as 7:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Patrick County Jail, Elbert Cassay, Jackie Bird and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Micheal Goss, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. United States of America
as 5:2020hc02068
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Donald Elbert Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Horton v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2020hc02030
Petitioner:
Elbert Justin Horton
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Clarke
as 7:2019cv00523
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Petitioner:
Elbert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Muhammad v. Kincaid et al
as 1:2019cv00562
Defendant:
Lieutenant Colonel Mark Sites, Lieutenant Colonel Kevin Andarayese, 1st Lt. Hovannhyan and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos A-Lail Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
