Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. Goodsum
as 23-7096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GOODSUM, Individual and Official Capacity, PRICE, Individual and Official Capacity, DOUG NEWTON, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Sarah Flanders v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6773
Petitioner / Appellant:
SARAH ELIZABETH FLANDERS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and HAROLD W. CLARKE
Anderson v. Goodsum et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Goodsum, FNU Price, Doug Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Lewis et al
as 1:2022cv01137
Plaintiff:
Shane Hopkins
Defendant:
CO. Lewis, LT. Boyle, CO. Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Sarah Flanders v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-6941
Petitioner / Appellant:
SARAH ELIZABETH FLANDERS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Flanders v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2022cv00439
Petitioner:
Sarah Elizabeth Flanders
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Buncombe County et al
as 1:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Keith Erwin Allen
Defendant:
Buncombe County, City of Asheville, Asheville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Cartledge
as 8:2012cv02670
Petitioner:
Danny Flanders Austin
Respondent:
Leroy Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
