Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 712
Michael Grace v. Alamance County
as 24-6538
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JERMAINE GRACE
Defendant: ALAMANCE COUNTY, GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER CROSS and others
Hunt v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03141
Plaintiff: Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant: Darren G. Jackson, Graham H. Atkinson, Gregory K. Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff: RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant: OFFICER RICKER, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richman v. Graham
as 9:2024cv01635
Petitioner: Ulysses Richman
Respondent: Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brogdon v. Graham
as 5:2024cv01706
Petitioner: Conell Brogdon
Respondent: Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
COTE v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv02859
Petitioner: RICHARD PAUL COTE
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant: Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCE v. TOLBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff: KENYON J. SPENCE
Defendant: SGT. TOLBERT and SGT. LENWOOD GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff: KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant: JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
Crowder et al v. Burress et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: Daniel L. Crowder and Diane L. Crowder
Defendant: Kimberly Burress, Bethany Herman, Gregory Moss, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?