Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Anthony Hoover El v. Forsyth County
as 24-6224
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY
Anthony Hoover El v. Stephen Waddel
as 24-6226
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDEL, Warden IV, JASON ADAMS, Gatekeeper, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Magistrate and others
Anthony Hoover El v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6228
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JUDGE L. TODD BURKE
Anthony Hoover v. Stephen Waddell
as 24-6376
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, Warden IV sued in individual and official capacity, ROY A. COOPER, III, Governor sued in individual and official capacity, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND, State Asst. District Attorney sued in individual and official capacity and others
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, ROY A. COOPER III, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER EL v. WADDEL et al
as 1:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDEL, JASON ADAMS, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER EL v. FORSYTH COUNTY
as 1:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. HOOVER EL
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Malik Raheem Hoover
Defendant:
H. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Moore v. Warden of W.C.I.
as 23-7263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT G. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF W.C.I. SHANE WEBER, NURSE TAMI OF W.C.I., DOCTOR OF W.C.I. JOHN DOE and others
Leonard Haley v. Holly Hoover
as 23-7119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD LEE HALEY
Defendant / Appellee:
HOLLY HOOVER, DR. ASRESAHAGN GETACHEW, Corizon Statewide Director, DR. HOWARD LEE COOK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
