Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Ray et al
as 2:2023cv05913
Plaintiff:
Travis J Wright
Defendant:
S.L.R.D.C. Director Ray, Captain Sweat, Lt Gaymon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wargas v. Watts et al
as 7:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Tristan Joseph Wargas
Defendant:
Major J. Watts, Sergent Rose, Sergent J. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contee v. Foust et al
as 1:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Robert Contee
Defendant:
Sgt. Wright, CO II Blain, CO II Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessing v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
Derick C Kessing
Defendant:
Smith, P. Temple, J. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Newsome et al
as 2:2018cv01587
Plaintiff:
Travis J Wright
Defendant:
K Newsome and Lt Vetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2016cv01330
Plaintiff:
Belialyanwu I. Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Department of Corrections, Meirs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hudgins et al
as 2:2010cv00386
Plaintiff:
Willie Devon Jones
Defendant:
Ms. Hudgins, J. Wright, C. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Eastwood v. Lee Kicklighter
as 10-6894
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. EASTWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE KICKLIGHTER, Instructor DCE/Vocation, DAVID J. WRIGHT, Regional Principal DCE, D. GOURDINE, Treatment Program Supervisor and others
Eastwood v. Kicklighter et al
as 2:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
John D. Eastwood
Defendant:
Lee Kicklighter, David J. Wright, D. Gourdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
