Cases 1 - 10 of 1,261
Jonathan Riches v. Calvin Broaddus
as 08-7531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant / Appellee:
CALVIN BROADDUS, d/b/a Snoop Doggy Dog
Jonathan Riches v. George Ryan
as 08-6707
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE H. RYAN, PURNELL PEACE, QUANIS PHILLIPS and others
Jonathan Riches v. Malcolm Forbes
as 08-6608
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant / Appellee:
MALCOLM STEVE FORBES, SPECIAL HOUSING UNIT and FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - WILLIAMSBURG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-7262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RICHES v. SHAHZAD et al
as 1:2010cv00494
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
FAISAL SHAHZAD and UMAR FAROUK ABDULMUTALLAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riches v. FAMM et al
as 3:2009cv00785
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
FAMM, Julie Stewart, Mary Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stanford v. Riches et al
as 3:2009cv00439
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Stanford
Defendant:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Leroy King, Laura Pendergest-Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Travolta et al
as 6:2008cv00955
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
John Travolta and Olivia Newton John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Riches v. Vick et al
as 3:2009cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Michael Vick and Marcus Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. South Africa et al
as 3:2009cv00330
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
South Africa, African National Congress, Inc., Thabo Mbeki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
