Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Taylor v. Zook
as 7:2019cv00245
Respondent:
David Zook
Petitioner:
James Michael Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor, Jr v. Brooks et al
as 3:2018cv00638
Defendant:
Unknown Nurses, Dr. Lui and Dr. M. Brooks
Plaintiff:
James M. Taylor, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Taylor v. Attorney General of Virginia
as 16-6780
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES E. TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, and its inferior courts and STATE OF VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, (DCSE)
Taylor v. Newcome et al
as 2:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Anson Taylor
Defendant:
Mr. Jeffrey Newcome, Dr. E. Boakye and Mrs. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Boxke et al
as 2:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
James A. Taylor
Defendant:
Dr. Boxke, Nurse Taylor and Jeffrey Newcome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Attorney General of Virginia et al
as 3:2014cv00509
Petitioner:
James E. Taylor
Respondent:
Attorney General of Virginia, Supreme Court of Virginia and its inferior courts and Virginia Division of Child Support Enforcement (DCSE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Holloway
as 2:2014cv19234
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Taylor
Defendant:
Gregory Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Taylor v. David Robinson
as 12-7671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES IRVIN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, JIM PARKS, Central Classification, ANITA BRYANT, Regional Ombudsman and others
Taylor v. Robinson et al
as 1:2012cv00802
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Taylor
Defendant:
David A. Robinson, Jim Parks, Anita Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Taylor
as 07-6827
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES DARREN TAYLOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
