Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ricky Butler v. Nurse Hryn
as 22-7469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE HRYN, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Back, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAW, JR. and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL, NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD, SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Ted Hull and others
Ricky Butler v. Edward Hull
as 22-6903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Ted Hull, NURSE HRYN, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Back and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL and NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD
Butler v. Northern Neck Regional Jail et al
as 1:2018cv01525
Defendant:
Sergeant Chatham, Correction Officer Houchin, Luetenant Newsome and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Chappell v. Dr. William Reese
as 16-7611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CHAPPELL
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. WILLIAM REESE, Northern Neck Regional Jail's in-house physician, sued individually in his official capacity, KEITH JOHNSON, Mental Health Counselor at NNRJ, sued individually in his official capacity, CAROLYN NEALE, RN was the Head Nurse/Nursing Supervisor at NNRJ, sued individually in her official capacity and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL
Johnson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv02005
Petitioner:
Keith Johnson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chappell v. Northern Neck Regional Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
William Chappell
Defendant:
Northern Neck Regional Jail, William Reese, Keith Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeas Jr. v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014ct03025
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
