Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Steed v. Lynch
as 5:2024ct03133
Plaintiff:
Byron Steed and Byron Lynn Steed
Defendant:
Sergeant Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv03010
Plaintiff:
James Lynch, III and Ras J. Ammi Tafari
Defendant:
Stacy Smith, Bonnie Degraffenried and Karen Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steed v. Lynch et al
as 5:2024ct03105
Plaintiff:
Byron Steed
Defendant:
Sgt. Lynch, Sgt. Bunn, Sgt. Hobgood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. USA
as 7:2024cv01219
Petitioner:
Roger Earl Lynch
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lynch, III v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
James Lynch, III
Defendant:
Stacy Smith, Karen Cooper and BONNIE DEGRAFFENRIED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamel Lunsford v. Warden Jacob
as 23-7075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL TYREE LUNSFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JACOB, WARDEN LOCKLEAR, TODD E. ISHEE, Commissioner of Prison/Director and others
Lynch v. Unspecified Defendant(s)
as 7:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Lynch
Defendant:
Unspecified Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Thompson et al
as 4:2023cv03630
Plaintiff:
David Lee Glenn
Defendant:
Unit Manager Thompson, Unit Manager Danford, Unit Manager Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ford v. Thompson et al
as 4:2023cv03631
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Ford, Jr.
Defendant:
Unit Manager Thompson, Unit Manager Danford, Unit Manager Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bridges v. Thompson et al
as 4:2023cv03629
Plaintiff:
Michael Bridges
Defendant:
Unit Manager Thompson, Unit Manager Danford, Unit Manager Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
