Cases 1 - 10 of 614
Wilson v. McCall
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R. Wilson
Defendant:
Leonard McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. McCall
as 7:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Brian Turner
Defendant:
Matt McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
McCall v. The State
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Quinn McCall
Defendant:
The State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
McCall v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02041
Petitioner:
Dashawn Jewelin McCall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens
as 23-6692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE WARDENS, BEVINS, Lieutenant, CLARK, Sergeant and others
Meyers v. Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens, FNU Bevins, FNU Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard Harris v. Nakita Ross
as 23-6433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
NAKITA ROSS, Parole Agent, CLEVELAND FRIDAY, Warden of Jessup Correctional Institution, MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Ward v. McCall et al
as 7:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell
Defendant:
Matthew McCall, Mark Jones, Mark B. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
