Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. National Security Agency et al
as 5:2022ct03351
Plaintiff:
Michael Taylor
Defendant:
National Security Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scioli v. National Security Agency
as 8:2020cv03161
Plaintiff:
Dana Scioli
Defendant:
National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Justin Credico v. National Security Agency
as 16-6402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and UNKNOWN AGENTS OF NSA TAO
Michael Taylor v. National Security Agency
as 16-6288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Credico v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Justin Credico
Defendant:
National Security Agency and Unknown Agents of NSA TAO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. National Security Agency
as 5:2015ct03225
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chadwick v. Cummings et al
as 1:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
Claude Wayne Chadwick
Defendant:
Sam R. Cummings, Scott Frost, Sim Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedington v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv00895
Plaintiff:
Calvin Scott Wedington
Defendant:
Obama and Director of National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl v. Director of National Security Agency
as 1:2011cv00677
Plaintiff:
Richard Alan Carl
Defendant:
Director of National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
