Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Hall v. Bedford et al
as 1:2023cv02623
Plaintiff:
Jesus Oneka Hall
Defendant:
Doctor Bedford, Assistant Warden/CDF Holdover, Nurse Peggy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Swan et al
as 1:2023cv02432
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Kelly
Defendant:
RN Burnice Swan, NP Janette Clark, RN Karen J. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Centerton, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davis
Defendant:
Centerton, Inc., Christopher Okala, Dr. Z and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarson v. Warden Reherman, FBOP
as 2:2020cv01386
Petitioner:
Peggy Shelton McCarson
Respondent:
Warden Reherman, FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pilczuk v. Dryden et al
as 2:2019cv00262
Defendant:
Bobby McGill, Phillip Dryden and Peggy Malloy
Plaintiff:
James Robert Pilczuk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00153
Plaintiff:
Peggy Webb
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Major Bernadette P Richardson and Warden Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Falkenstein v. Rahman et al
as 8:2018cv03715
Defendant:
Dr. Ashraf, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Bernice Swan and others
Plaintiff:
John W. Falkenstein
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Walker v. Osborne et al
as 2:2018cv00548
Defendant:
Koko, Osborne and Peggy Malloy
Plaintiff:
Jacques Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00781
Plaintiff:
G'Andre Coleman
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
