Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Petit Pierre v. Warden Janson
as 23-6808
Petitioner:
PETIT PIERRE
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN JANSON, FCI Edgefield
Pierre v. Janson
as 4:2023cv02216
Petitioner:
Petit Pierre
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. Woody et al
as 3:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Amira Sleem, Brooke Petit and C. T. Woody
Plaintiff:
Milton A. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erwin v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
William I. Erwin
Defendant:
Eric Rodriguez, Chuck Vines, R. Van Williams and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Allan Thomas Petit v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6028
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALLAN THOMAS PETIT
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director VA Dept. of Corr.
Petit v. Clarke
as 3:2015cv00308
Petitioner:
Allan Thomas Petit
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Petit v. Clarke
as 3:2015cv00309
Petitioner:
Allan Thomas Petit
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Petit v. Unknown
as 3:2015cv00266
Petitioner:
Allan Thomas Petit
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fredrick Culp v. Doctor Alewine
as 14-7111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDRICK Y. CULP, a/k/a Fredrick Yvonne Culp
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR ALEWINE, South Carolina Department of Corrections, DOCTOR JOHN PATE, Doctor at Lee Correctional Institution, DOCTOR AMONITTI, Doctor at Ridgeland Correctional Institution and others
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Palmetto Health Richland Hospital, DOCTORS AT RICHLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, that performed heart surgery and others
Brown v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2013cv00369
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Todd G. Petit and Matthew R. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
