Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Wood v. Herrick, MD, MSHA, et al
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
James R Wood
Defendant:
Steve Herrick, MD, Alvin Harris, MD, Clarence Friend, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Weber et al
as 1:2021cv00353
Defendant:
Moore, Wuestneck, Thornton and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brooks v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2019cv01240
Petitioner:
Altony Brooks
Respondent:
Nurse Amy Enlue, Lt. Church, South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capps v. Oconee County Sheriff's Department et al
as 8:2018cv02700
Defendant:
Justin Pelfrey, Edda Cammick, Mike Crenshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Michael G Capps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunigan et al v. Purkey et al
as 5:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Eric Scott Barker
Defendant:
Brian Purkey, Jeff Givens, Vinnie Zummo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunigan v. Purkey et al
as 2:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Megan Eileen Dunigan
Defendant:
Brian Purkey, Jeff Givens, Vinnie Zummo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunigan v. Purkey et al
as 3:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Megan Eileen Dunigan
Defendant:
Brian Purkey, Jeff Givens, Vinnie Zummo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Al-Mujahidin v. Root et al
as 9:2015cv04017
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Al-Mujahidin
Defendant:
Randall A Root, Travis Peay and John D McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Toldman et al
as 6:2013cv01874
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Mr Toldman, T Robertson, R Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bright v. William et al
as 5:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Kenwood Bright
Defendant:
James William, Lieutenant Lasley, Rhonda Abston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
