Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael Gorbey v. OBAMA
as 17-6035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, United States President Washington D.C., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Washington DC, LINDSEY GRAHAM, U.S. Senate South Carolina and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Gregory Jackson
as 16-7458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY E. JACKSON, D.C. Superior Ct. Judge, ERIC T. WASHINGTON, Chief Judge, D.C.C.A., GLICKMAN, Associate Judge D.C.C.A. and others
Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Jackson et al
as 2:2016cv00551
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Gregory E. Jackson, Eric T. Washington, Glickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. USA
as 3:2015cv03781
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darrell T Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jeffrey Washington v. Unknown
as 14-7275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY T. WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN
James T. Washington v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv13603
Movant:
James T. Washington
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Washington v. Clarke
as 1:2012cv01400
Petitioner:
Richard T. Washington
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv01379
Petitioner:
James T. Washington
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Washington v. Johnson
as 2:2010cv00089
Petitioner:
Milford T. Washington
Respondent:
Gene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Washington v. Paul Lanteigene
as 08-6526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY T. WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL J. LANTEIGENE, Sheriff and JAMAL U. DEEN, A.H.-MD Doctor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
