Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Toomer v. Tolson et al
as 5:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Shamond Toomer
Defendant:
Kevin R Tolson, John Hicks and Rodney Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Winston v. MRDCC et al
as 1:2022cv02305
Plaintiff:
Troy Winston
Defendant:
MRDCC, Warden Johnson, CO II Jermiah Kinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Toomer v. Wexford Health Care Inc.
as 8:2018cv03048
Plaintiff:
Derrick Toomer
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care Inc.
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bey v. State of South Carolina, North Charleston et al
as 2:2018cv01866
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, North Charleston, Magistrate Thaddeus Doughty, Sarah Fortier and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Gerrill Toomer Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01252
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bey v. Duff et al
as 2:2017cv01004
Plaintiff:
Reginald Gerrill Toomer Bey
Defendant:
John Duff, Steven Evans, North Charleston Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toomer v. Horry County Police Department et al
as 4:2016cv02773
Plaintiff:
Cody Thomas Toomer
Defendant:
Horry County Police Department , Kenneth Marcus , Tina Vaught and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toomer v. McLane et al
as 8:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Derrick K Toomer
Defendant:
Patricia McLane, Thiruvendran Vignarajah and Micheal Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toomer v. McFadden
as 4:2015cv04871
Petitioner:
Tommy Toomer
Respondent:
Warden McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TOOMER v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2015cv00989
Petitioner:
DWAYNE TOOMER
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
