Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Roy Smith v. U.S. Marshal Fugitive Unit
as 23-7100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, KEVIN CONNOLLY, U.S. Marshal's Fugitive Unit, AARON KIRK, ValDosta GA Police Lieutenant and others
Jamel Lunsford v. Warden Jacob
as 23-7075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL TYREE LUNSFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JACOB, WARDEN LOCKLEAR, TODD E. ISHEE, Commissioner of Prison/Director and others
Roy Smith v. U. S. Marshal Fugitive Unit
as 23-6188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
U. S. MARSHAL FUGITIVE UNIT and CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Deondre Russell v. U.S. Marshal
as 22-6713
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEONDRE MONTREAL RUSSELL
Respondent / Appellee:
U. S. MARSHAL
Ovalle v. Chesapeak Detention Center et al
as 1:2018cv03172
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons, U S Marshal Service and Chesapeak Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Luis Garza Ovalle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Daniel Eric Cobble v. U.S. Government
as 18-6433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
U S GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, KENNY ATKINSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-6043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Hylton
as 15-7589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HYLTON, CDUSM, U. S. Marshal Service, D. LAWHORNE, Sheriff, STERNS, Chief and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01298
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Page et al
as 6:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
James Page, Stoney Drake, R B Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
