Cases 1 - 10 of 679
Warren v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Robert William Warren, Jr
Defendant:
DPSCS, JCI Warden, JCI Ast. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Love et al
as 5:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Skyler Love, FNU Greene, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Love et al
as 5:2024ct03125
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Skyler Love, Deputy Greene, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hines v. USA
as 3:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Warren Eugene Hines, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Casey v. Nancie Williams
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
ADAM NICHOLAS CASEY
Defendant:
NANCIE WILLIAMS, D.B.A. Judge "JDR" Warren County Court, Juvenile Domestic Relations and UNKNOWN, Individual at the Court Hearing Representing Department of Social Services Child Support Enforcement Division
Gary Hancock, Jr. v. US
as 24-6368
Plaintiff:
GARY WARREN HANCOCK, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Foster, Jr. v. Warren Alexander
as 24-6313
Plaintiff:
MARK BRIAN FOSTER, JR.
Defendant:
WARREN ALEXANDER, BRYANT POOLE and CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Eastern Correctional
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
