Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Betty Hart v. Hanover County School Board
as 13-1642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETTY W. HART
Defendant - Appellee:
HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and MICHAEL R. ASHBY, SR.
Bryner et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tim Bryner , Gregory Carter , Alfred P. Clark, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Roger L. Harris and County of Spotsylvania, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hayes v. Agape Counseling & Therapeutic Services, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hayes and Candice L. Harts
Defendant:
Agape Counseling & Therapeutic Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Goode v. American Veterans, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv02414
Plaintiff:
Melinda A. Goode
Defendant:
American Veterans, Inc., Velma R. Hart and Linda A. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Betty Hart v. Hanover County School Board
as 11-1619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETTY W. HART
Defendant - Appellee:
HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and MICHAEL R. ASHBY, SR.
Hart v. Hanover County School Board et al
as 3:2010cv00794
Plaintiff:
Betty W. Hart
Defendant:
Hanover County School Board and Michael R. Ashby, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dennis v. Hart Heritage, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00780
Plaintiff:
Milton Dennis
Defendant:
Hart Heritage, Inc. and Kenneth J. Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hart v. NVR, Inc.
as 8:2007cv02744
Plaintiff:
Darren Hart and Daniel Fisher
Defendant:
NVR, Inc. and NVR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hart v. Hackney
as 5:2007cv00132
Plaintiff:
Ted Hart
Defendant:
Richard Hackney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
HART v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2007cv00748
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA S. HART
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
