Cases 91 - 100 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Wildcat Retro Brands LLC v. NWL Distributing LLC et al
as 8:2020cv04207
Plaintiff:
Wildcat Retro Brands LLC
Defendant:
Keybank LLC, Amazon.com Sales LLC, Lakeshirts Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demark v. Jetson Electric Bikes LLC et al
as 9:2020cv03706
Defendant:
Jetson Electric Bikes LLC and Amazon.com Inc
Plaintiff:
Jill Demark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Amazon.com, Inc. v. WDC Holdings LLC
as 20-1743
Defendant:
MANASSAS NCP FF, LLC, JOHN DOES, 1-20, VILLANOVA TRUST and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON DATA SERVICES, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN WATSON and WDC HOLDINGS LLC, d/b/a Northstar Commercial Partners
The Nationwide General Insurance Company v. ABF/LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00245
Plaintiff:
The Nationwide General Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., AFB/LLC, AW Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davetta Range v. Dana Van Metre
as 20-1345
Defendant / Appellee:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, BRIAN A. JACKSON, SA RACHEL ROLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVETTA LYNN RANGE
Range v. Van Metre et al
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Stacey, Magistrate Judge Michael Nachmanoff and others
Plaintiff:
Davetta Lynn Range
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00927
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Maglula, Ltd. v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00922
Plaintiff:
Maglula, Ltd.
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
